The next method for resolving IRS liability is the 120-day Extension to Pay. The IRS particularly if the client has a wonderful compliance history will grant an automatic 120-day Extension to Pay. You can get this simply by calling ACS or writing in. We recommend you call ACS in saying, “My client intends to pay fully. But we need a little bit of time. Can we get 120 days?” Generally, if you don’t ask for 120 days then we won’t give you 120 days. So, make sure you say, “I want a 120 days.” Again, when you’re dealing with ACS agents, a lot of times they are not being most taxpayer-friendly. You want to make sure you ask for your 120 days. However, what the IRS doesn’t tell you is even though a 120-day Extension is granted for you automatically, there may be ways to buy your client a little bit more time. For example, if you call ACS and you say, “My client is going to pay you but we need 30 days to pay it off. Can you give me a 30-day collection hold?” The IRS will say, “Great.
video-blog
The Statute of Limitations on Collections
Briefly I want to talk to you a little bit about the Statute of Limitations on Collections. By law, the IRS has 10 years to collect on a liability from the daily assessment. The IRS when a liability is assessed, let’s say the taxpayer will file the return on April 15th of 2010, then, the IRS would have until April 15th of 2020 to collect on that liability. Now, the date of assessment is really important for determining statute of limitations because there are multiple things that would cause the Statute of Limitations to talk. For example, if you have a 2010 return which is due in 2011 and you don’t file it until 2014, then the date of the assessment is not 2011, it is 2014. Correspondingly, if you file a return on 2011 and then amend the return in 2014, that will re-trigger the Statute of Limitations on Collections. Also note, if you got a client with SFR filings, a Substitute for Returns, and you go and file the tax return, that will reset the collection’s Statute of Limitations. So, it’s very important to be mindful of the collection’s Statute of Limitations.
The Problems with Running From the IRS
Briefly, I also want to talk about some of the problems associated with running from the IRS. Now, it seems like a funny subject–people running or evading their collection potential. I don’t want to use the term ‘evading’ very loosely because I will not want to see a criminal activity. But we may be dealing with a client who has just been off the grid for a couple of years, or through a series of an unfortunate circumstances has not met their filing obligations, and maybe have not been using their bank account or have been kind of sticking their head in the sand. By ‘evading,’ we don’t suggest they’re criminals. They’re just ducking their responsibilities from the IRS as it tends to happen from time to time. The problems with “running” from the IRS are these. Mainly you are always at risk of collections. Any asset that you have, any job that you hold, if you are not actively working on an installment agreement with the IRS or negotiating an Offer in Compromise or doing something to resolve your account, then you are technically not in compliance. When you are technically not in compliance, the IRS can take a serious of actions against you. They can levy you. They can garnish your wages. They can put liens on you. That pressure doesn’t go away if you are not doing something to actively resolve your account.
Installment Agreements
The next thing I want to talk to you about is Installment Agreements or payment plans. The IRS is famous for accepting payment plans for liability. They recognize the taxpayers who may owe a large liability may not have all the money upfront. Therefore, in order to get back in the compliance they need to be put on the payment plan. There are four types of payment plans that you should be generally be aware of. The first one is what’s called an automatic payment plan or an automatic installment agreement. An automatic installment agreement is an Installment Agreement by right. If you owe less than $10,000, the IRS statutorily require to put you in a payment plan if you request it. That’s a very powerful tool for taxpayers with smaller liabilities and you can call the IRS, and put them in a payment plan immediately without much consideration to their financials. The second type of an installment agreement is what we call a Streamline Installment Agreement. Taxpayer should owe $25,000 or less or in certain cases $50,000 or less can apply for a streamline installment agreement.
What to do if your Installment Agreement is Rejected
What happens when an Installment Agreement is rejected? When an Installment Agreement is rejected, fear not. You have several options. What will happen is you usually submit a request for an installment agreement to the IRS with the company financials. If the IRS decides to reject that Financial Statement, they will issue a letter. That letter is a formal rejection of the installment agreement. They say, “Dear taxpayer, we have decided to reject your installment agreement. We think you can pay.” We know you want to pay $300 a month; we think you can pay $3,000 a month.” The taxpayer goes, “Oh, no. I can’t pay $3,000 a month.” At that point you can take your Installment Agreement to the Appeals Division of the IRS through what’s called the Collection Due Process Appeal. You can appeal the rejected installment agreement. That letter is your ticket. In your appeals, you file a CDP Form and get into appeals. An Appeals officer will give you a second bite of the apple with respect to your financial statement. The Appeals Officer generally is not allowed to consider new information. He has to go base on the financial statement that you submitted. But oftentimes that letter that you received from the IRS rejecting your financial statement will clue you in to what the problem is. The IRS thinks you have available equity in your home.
The Offer in Compromise Process: Types of Offers in Compromise
The Offer in Compromise Program is a program that was developed by the IRS to give taxpayers a fresh start on life. A taxpayer in exchange for a lump sum or in exchange for a settlement of monthly payments can eliminate past tax liability in exchange to the promise of future compliance to the IRS. If the taxpayer promises to pay in full and on time, and file on time then the IRS will forgive their past tax liability. Sounds a good, great deal but it’s also a tremendous deal for the government, as well, because the taxpayer is essentially getting back into compliance to paying everything and the government loses that cost of having to administer the taxpayer’s file. It’s actually a win-win for both parties. With that said, there’s been a lot of negative press associated with the Offer in Compromise Program. You’ll see hilarious ads on TV that you can settle your tax liabilities for putting your pennies on a dollar. Although that is true, a lot of people have abused the program. They submit Offers in Compromise that don’t have a chance of being accepted. Offers in Compromises work on a pretty strict formula which I will get into a minute. The most common type of Offer in Compromise is what we call a Doubt as to Collectability Offer in Compromise.
How Offers in Compromise Are Considered
Let’s talk a little bit for a second about Doubt as to Collectability Offer in Compromise, the successes and the more common ones. So, Doubt as to Collectability Offers in Compromise fall under a specific set of guidelines. Doubt as to Liability Offers in Compromise are based on a formula that is the quick sale value to find by the IRS at 80% of the value of the taxpayer’s assets plus the positive monthly cash flow times 60 months. If a taxpayer is showing $10 and positive monthly cash flow over 60 months, that’s $600. A hundred dollars a month in positive monthly cash flow, that’s $6,000. A thousand dollars a month in positive monthly cash flow, that’s $60,000. Positive cash flow is really important from an Offer in Compromise standpoint because little changes in the positive monthly cash flow of the taxpayer really affect the minimum offer amount that the IRS will accept. When determining whether your client is an Offer in Compromise candidate, one of the best things to do is ask the client what assets do you have? List out the assets that they have, determine what their value is, meaning not with the client’s assessed value is but with the quick sale value of the client of the asset is. Then, take those assets and list the client’s income and expenses out, and figure out what their positive monthly cash flow is if any and then, that gives you an idea of what their minimum offer amount is. That’s a really great trick to pre-screen Offers in Compromise.
Issues in the Offer in Compromise Process
The next thing I want to talk about, I want to talk about some issues associated with Offers in Compromises. The first issue I wanted to discuss is what we call dissipated assets. A dissipated asset is an asset that the taxpayer has disposed of, that the IRS is going to count towards their reasonable collection potential or their minimum Offer in Compromise. For example, this happens all the time. People will liquidate their IRAs and they will go out and spend money on all sorts of things. They’re going on vacations or trips or food or whatever. The IRS will come back and they’ll say, “Wait, the $100,000 in this IRA, what happened to the money?” The taxpayer will throw their hands and then go, “I don’t know. We just spent it.” The IRS goes, “That $100,000 of money should have been used to pay your tax liability. So, we’re going to consider this a dissipated asset.” Dissipated asset comes up all the time with property. They come up with IRA’s securities. Basically, you need to be able to substantiate to the IRS the money that was used with the dissipated assets was recently spent on ordinary and necessary living expenses, what other things that the IRS are going to accept. It’s really important that the outset to identify any dissipated assets that you might have, otherwise you might make an Offer in Compromise only to be disappointed at the end. The next issue I want to talk about is valuation. Valuation is a really hot topic within the IRS and it’s something that practitioners use all the time to present the client’s financials in the best light possible.
Taxes and Bankruptcy
Taxes and bankruptcy. Bankruptcy is what we consider a nuclear option. It is a very extreme measure. It can be a very effective tool if the taxpayer has other debts. But it has a lasting impact on the taxpayer and on their credit and on the perception of their general financial competency. We generally recommend bankruptcy as a last resort particularly if the taxpayer only has tax liability which is perhaps best settled in the Offer in Compromise program versus going and filing a Chapter Seven. However, bankruptcy can be an effective tool where there are other debts or where an Offer in Compromise might not be the most feasible route to go for a variety of circumstances. Obviously this is based on the individual and the variety of circumstances that surround most people which were all different. But in terms of bankruptcy, we are dealing with liabilities that are income taxes. There cannot be any indicator of fraud or tax evasion. We are dealing with tax that are at least three years old.
IRS liens so I want to talk briefly about IRS liens
IRS liens so I want to talk briefly about IRS liens IRS lien or lean in general is a security interest in a piece of property so an IRS lien it represents the government’s interest in the personal and real property of a taxpayer a tax lien has the effect of attaching to all the taxpayers real and personal assets and in the event of the taxpayer goes to sell one of those assets the government it has a claim to that money now in actuality liens really serve two purposes number one they attach to property and make it really difficult to sell houses and occasionally it can make it really difficult to sell vehicles or larger items of personal property to believe those that are registered with the DMV and secondly it leans have a very negative impact on a taxpayer’s credit and their ability to borrow now the officially the policy statement from the IRS is that liens are used to preserve the government’s interest but there is a big debate between. The IRS and the tax practitioner community on what the efficacy of liens are particularly where a taxpayer doesn’t have any assets for the government to secure because the government likes to say that leaves are a necessary measure of preserving a security interest we would argue that the liens are a punitive measure that really only impacts a taxpayer’s credit particularly you have a case where taxpayer has entered into installment agreement that will full pay a liability and the IRS goes and files lien anyway that is a particularly hot topic of debate, but an IRS tax lien can be dealt with in one of three ways you can withdraw you can ask the government to withdraw the lien meaning that the gleam effectively never happened and will completely disappear from a tax payers credit the government can release.