Brotman LawSimilar to the asset/equity table, the IRS income and expense table (IET) outlines necessary living expenses, where the taxpayer lists both total income and expenses. The IRS income and expense table is divided into two major categories where the taxpayer eventually calculates the net difference multiplied by one or more amounts to get to “amount that could be paid from future income” (IRS.gov, “Income and Expense Table,” 8/25/2013).
Salability, or marketability, is defined in terms of liquidity, “the ability to quickly convert property to cash or pay a liability” (IRS.gov, “Discount for Lack of Marketability: Job Aid for IRS Valuation Professionals, September 25, 2009, page 5” 8/25/2013). Under the IRS offer in compromise rules, liquidity is essentially the ability to convert an asset into cash without losing the principal. Conversion is not only specific to the term asset; it may include business, business ownership interest, and/or security.
IRS financial analysis is conducted by the IRS in order to both analyze and verifies financial information. When conducting an IRS financial analysis, the IRS evaluates the income and expenses of the taxpayer to calculate for disposable income. Disposable income is defined as gross income less all allowable expenses. During their IRS financial analysis, the IRS also analyzes assets to resolve balance due accounts. To do this, the IRS will request that the taxpayer makes full, immediate payment if their cash on hand is equal to the total liability. In addition, the IRS will identify key sources of funds, “liquid assets which can be pledged as security or readily converted to cash” (IRS.gov, “Part 5. Collecting Process, Chapter 15. Financial Analysis, Section 1. Financial Analysis Handbook,” 8/24/2013). Identification of key sources of funds is also extended to considering unencumbered assets, interests in estates and trusts, and lines of credit (“Section 1. Financial Analysis Handbook”). When analyzing assets to resolve balance due accounts, the IRS will also determine the priority of the Notice of Federal Tax Lien.
IRS Form 433-A, Collection Information Statement for Wage Earners and Self-Employed Individuals is used to collect financial information about the taxpayer and the taxpayer’s ability to repay a current tax liability.
A taxpayer may choose the lump sum offer, which is defined as an offer where the taxpayer makes five or fewer installment payments within 24 months after the offer is accepted. “If a taxpayer submits a lump sum offer, the taxpayer must include with the Form 656, Offer in Compromise a nonrefundable payment equal to 20 percent of the amount. This payment is required in addition to the $150 application fee” (IRS.gov, “Topic 204 – Offers in Compromise,” 8/22/2013). Under the offer in compromise requirements, the nonrefundable amount cannot be returned to the taxpayer if the offer is either rejected or accepted. Instead, it will be applied to the taxpayer’s liability.
You must weigh the pros and cons of offer in compromise in light of the other options available to you. When considering whether to choose this option, you must also consider the advantages and disadvantages. The offer in compromise allows you the opportunity to reduce your tax liability relative to your current financial situation. However, settling with the IRS by way of offer in compromise might be the second-best option. For example, the requirements for accepting an offer in compromise are stringent. Taxpayers are required to have low monthly income and practically no assets. “Thus you may end up wasting time and money on trying to [settle] with the IRS when that effort could have been applied toward a better method of resolving your tax liability” (IRSSolution.com, “Pros and Cons of An Offer in Compromise,” 8/24/2013).
An offer in compromise (OIC) is a type of agreement between both the taxpayer and the Internal Revenue Service outlining and settling the taxpayer’s tax liabilities for less than the current balance due owed. If the taxpayer’s liabilities can be fully paid through the utilization of an installment agreement or any other related means, then the taxpayer would not ordinarily be eligible for an OIC.
J. K. Harris is one such company plagued with the woes of consumer complaints and subsequent lawsuits. JK Harris & Company, LLC was a tax representation firm. Founded in 1997, the company specialized in solving IRS and state tax problems. The founder, John K. Harris, penned three books on the subject and grew his company to national recognition. Although the company grew from 450 sales offices to eight regional operations centers, it still suffered under the burden of battling lawsuits where customers complained about misleading business and advertising practices. Lawsuits from past customers claimed that J. K. Harris charged exorbitant fees for resolving tax problems only to discover that the company failed to deliver on its promises. The company was also charged with engaging in deceptive practices. The company’s founder ushered the company through bankruptcy and the company was later shut down.
The IRS typically rejects an installment agreement for one of three reasons. For example, if the IRS determines that your living expenses do not fall under the category of necessary, your agreement will more than likely be rejected. The IRS considers extravagant expenses as those that include charitable contributions, private school funding, hefty credit card payments. In addition, if you fail to provide accurate information on Form 433-A, Collection Information Statement, you can expect your agreement to be rejected. Lastly, if you defaulted on a previous installment agreement, your new proposal may receive skepticism and be subsequently rejected.
The Internal Revenue Service defines default of an installment agreement as the taxpayer providing inaccurate information or the taxpayer not meeting the terms of their agreement. In this case, the agreement may be terminated. A taxpayer may appeal a proposed termination.